| The Mental Side
of the 1999 Australian Open
I hope you all enjoyed the Australian Open, whether up close in person
or via satellite. This month, we'll take a look at a few of the
psychological skills displayed in the finals. See how these might relate
to your game. You may not have the firepower of Kafelnikov or the court
coverage of Hingis, but you can still acquire the tenacity and mental
skills of a master. Even the best players in the world win and lose on
the quality of their mental equipment.
Women's Final (Martina Hingis def. Amelie Maueresmo 6-2, 6-3)
What a great run this Australian was for the unseeded player from
France! She possessed much more than a powerful backhand and laser sharp
serve to make it all the way through to the finals - she also showed
unusual mental toughness for a player ranked # 29 prior to the event.
Nevertheless, the powerful groundstrokes were not quite enough against
the more experienced Hingis.
Most notable in this match was the low first serve percentage of
Mauresmo (46%). When she raises this to 66%, world beware! Shoulder and
back muscles are often affected first when a player becomes tense -
disrupting the service. She admitted that the pressure in this match was
high. If you can relate to these sensations, you'll benefit from
reviewing:
Competitive Pressure in Tennis &
Stress Relief in Tennis.
Give Hingis credit for remaining confident and calm (See the
Art
Of Confidence) and having the killer instinct (See
Developing the Killer Instinct). She turned it up a notch when
needed and had the guts to take chances at the right time -- like that
incredible drop shot from the baseline. Don't try this unless you're a
pro! Hingis also counterpunched beautifully, and covered the court like
a king-sized blanket.
Perhaps the final game was the best lesson in mental skills. Mauresmo
refused to quit. She played even more aggressively when behind, and
erased 6 match points. She went to her favorite weapon, her stunning
backhand, and rather than worry about the outcome, she stayed focused in
the moment (See
Attentional Control in Tennis). She repeatedly crushed winners when
most mortals would have been overcome by fear of an error (See
Confronting Fear in Tennis). Despite her brilliance, Hingis
outlasted her with her own brand of never-say-die competitiveness (See
Competitiveness in Tennis).
Men's Final (Yevgeny Kafelnikov def. Thomas Enqvist 4-6, 6-0, 6-3,
7-6)
From a psychological perspective, this was a classic match. After a
slow start, Kafelnikov outlasted the Swede with his experience and
consistency, and this consisted mostly of mental skills. Yevgeny was
quoted after the match as saying "I broke Thomas mentally." It's hard to
disagree, as Enqvist uncharacteristically committed 61 unforced errors
to Kafelnikov's 35.
Enqvist played very well in the 4th set, but appeared to become
increasingly angry as the match progressed (If you can relate, See
Understand and Conquering Anger!). At 6-5, he appeared to become
unsettled when he floated a forehand long.
The obvious mental contrast, however, was most apparent in the 4th
set tiebreaker. After questioning a call that went against him, he hit
his worst shot of the day, a shanked forehand long. The relationship
between this shot and his reduced focus was clear (See
Attention Control in Tennis). He dropped his racket and never
recovered. Here is what followed: two backhands very wide, double fault
(looking frustrated), easy backhand approach into the net, and a double
fault. Kafelnikov, on the other hand, gained confidence as his lead
increased, and polished a great angled volley for a 6-1 lead before the
final double fault.
In this battle of nerves, Enqvist was no match for the steady
Russian. Thomas is a talented player who will most likely return. On
this Australian day, however, he appeared to allow his frustration and
energy levels to rise dangerously high (See
Optimizing Arousal in Tennis). The result was distractibility and
loss of control.
I hope you've all enjoyed this brief look at the mind games down
under. See you next month ...
Last Chance: Who is the Most Creative Tennis Player in History?
Thanks to all who voted for the most creative tennis player in history
(See
last month's article). The response has been excellent, but so close
that I've decided to give you some feedback and extend the contest one
final month. I want to hear from ALL OF YOU! Vote now by sending me a
message using
this
form.
Here are your responses to date:
First Place: John McEnroe -- 26% of all votes
Second Place: Jimmy Connors -- 11% of all votes
Trailing most closely behind McEnroe and Connors are the following
creative players: Ilie Nastase, Martina Navratilova, Mansour Bahrami,
Stefan Edberg, Gabriela Sabatini, Michael Chang, Arthur Ashe, Boris
Becker, Johan Kriek, Bobby Riggs, Gustavo Kuerten, and Martina Hingis.
|